Dyslexia: decoding and sequencing difficulties
Fluid, expert reading is built upon clearly identified cognitive abilities, in particular relating to processing the sound of speech, but also, as we will see, in processing the order of phonemes (sequentiality). Although this is a necessary condition, however, it is not sufficient. Because, although these capacities are deficient in dyslexic children, they are not lacking in those children who are labelled 'poor readers'. 'These children show no such fundamental difficulties.' explains Poncelet. 'Their representations of the sounds of speech are therefore normal. The problem lies elsewhere. Either they haven't benefited from good learning methods or the necessary support, or they suffer from concentration difficulties or lack of motivation. ' Phonological consciencePoncelet goes on to specify that establishing the distinction, in adulthood, between dyslexics and poor readers is sometimes difficult. Why? Because a good experience of reading has an influence on the representation of sounds. It isn't unusual for people to say: 'When I hear a word, I see it in its written form' or 'When I hear a word I don't know, I try to imagine it written down'. While phonological representations influence spelling, spelling also influences phonological representations. 'Eventually, the level of understanding the sounds of language is not the same in someone who has learned to read and someone who has not, despite having the required prerequisites', says Poncelet. By adulthood, it is difficult to make a differential diagnosis and a battery of appropriate tests is required, all pointing to the question of evaluating the degree of deficiency in decoding graphemes. The problem is even more taxing when the forest can't be seen for the trees: a dyslexic who has reached university level, having benefited from appropriate support during childhood, often reads better than a poor reader. The right orderIn an article published in November 2010 in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Steve Majerus, an F.R.S.-FNRS senior scientist working in the Psychology, Cognition and Behaviour Department of the ULg, shows that, in contrast to widely received wisdom, short-term verbal memory is not a specific entity with its own existence (read the article Short term memory revisited). Rather, it can be compared to a verbal information retention function which emanates from the interaction of three more general systems: the language system (in particular long-term verbal memory), attentional control and the system of 'serial order' processing (sequentiality). |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2007 ULi�ge
|
||